Manila, Philippines – The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) released the results of Geodetic Engineer Licensure Examination held this October 2018, which conducted in Manila and Cebu.
Top 10 – Geodetic Engineer “October 2018” Results
Members of the Geodetic Engineering Board who gave the licensure examination are Engr. Epifanio D. Lopez, Chairman; Engr. Concordio D. Zuñiga and Engr. Randolf S. Vicente, Members.
Kristian Rabi Monay of University of The Philippines Diliman got the highest percentage with 90%, followed by Abel Niño Manguilimotan Ulson with 88.60%.
Below are the top 10 examinee who got the highest percentage.
| Rank |
Name |
School |
Rating (%) |
| 1 |
Kristian Rabi Monay |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
90 |
| 2 |
Abel Niño Manguilimotan Ulson |
Visayas State University (For.Visca,Lsu.)-Baybay |
88.60 |
| 3 |
Cristina Joyce Carranza Bachini |
Tarlac Agricultural University(For Tarlac C.A.) |
87.80 |
| Karl Kevin Dungca Talplacido |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
| 4 |
Dariel Franz Poblete Noveloso |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
87.40 |
| 5 |
David Carlos Cordial Naval |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
87.20 |
| 6 |
Mark Jacinto Mallanao Ramos |
Visayas State University (For.Visca,Lsu.)-Baybay |
86.60 |
| 7 |
Fritz Rhaem Malinao Olivar |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
86.20 |
| 8 |
Louie Cantila Divinagracia |
Negros Oriental State University (Cvpc)-Dumaguete |
86.00 |
| Christian Dave Libo-On Labrador |
Visayas State University (For.Visca,Lsu.)-Baybay |
| Gene Loyd Musa Nares |
Bicol University-Legazpi |
| 9 |
Lovely Dela Peña Mariones |
University Of Southeastern Philippines-Davao City |
85.80 |
| Carl Angelo Peralta Miraflor |
Bicol University-Legazpi |
| 10 |
Franklin Decosto Maraya |
University Of The Philippines Diliman |
85.60 |
Oath Taking ceremony of the new successful Geodetic Engineer WILL BE ANNOUNCED LATER per PRC website.
Source: PRC
Disclaimer: The view and opinions expressed in this blog post are that of the author and do not in any way represents the agency or department he/she currently belongs to. Further, this information should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any specific provider, service or offering.